Unconscious bias is a word you may be familiar with, but did you know 48% of recruiters report bias affects their candidate choice? While we want to believe in our intuition on the right “fit” for our teams and organizations, unconscious preferences still sway our decisions. Let’s learn the nuances of unconscious bias, explore its impact on recruiting, and discover strategies to minimize bias’ influence on your recruiting process. 

What is Unconscious Bias?

Unconscious bias, or implicit bias, refers to the social stereotypes and prejudices we hold about certain groups of people that we form outside our conscious awareness. Everyone has unconscious beliefs, and these biases are influenced by our background, cultural environment, and personal experiences. These biases are automatic and unintentional, yet they can significantly influence behavior, especially in professional settings.

How Does Unconscious Bias Affect Recruiters?

Resume Screening

During resume screening, unconscious bias can creep into how we view a candidate’s name, education, or previous employer. For example, studies have shown that resumes with “white-sounding” names receive 50% more callbacks. No one intentionally thinks about a person’s identity, but unconsciously we are categorizing them based on our bias. 

Affinity Bias

Affinity bias occurs when you favor candidates who share similarities with yourself, such as attending the same school, coming from the same hometown, or having similar interests. While this bias might seem harmless, it can create homogeneity in the workplace if it continues to drive the recruiting decision. 

Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one’s preexisting beliefs. For example, if you have a “gut feeling” that a candidate is not right despite having a flawless application, you may look for answers that justify the feeling. It can develop into leading questions in the interview process or nitpicking the time jump in their resume. 

Stereotyping

Stereotyping, while more commonly an explicit bias, can still creep in when we make decisions. Holding a generalized belief about certain groups of people based on race, gender, age, or other characteristics can lead to assumptions about a candidate’s abilities or work ethic, which are not evidence-based. For example, a recruiter might unconsciously assume that an older candidate is less tech-savvy or that a woman may be less committed to her career because she has children.

The Halo and Horn Effect

The halo effect occurs when you form a positive impression of a candidate based on one strong trait, which positively influences your perception of the candidate’s other qualities. Conversely, the horn effect occurs when one negative trait negatively skews your perception of the candidate. Both effects can result in an imbalanced evaluation, where you overlook critical skills or red flags because you are biased toward a single characteristic.

The Long-Term Impact of Bias on Recruitment

Lack of Diversity

The most obvious consequence of unconscious bias is a lack of diversity. Biased hiring decisions over time lead to a homogenous workforce, where employees share similar backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. It emphasizes “culture fit” over what a candidate could add to the organization and team. 

Exclusion

Choosing certain types of candidates can exclude others and turn decision-makers into unintentional gatekeepers. Eventually, it creates a cycle where certain groups remain underrepresented in a particular industry or role, further entrenching systemic inequalities. 

Legal Risks

Organizations that fail to address unconscious bias in their hiring practices may face legal risks. Discriminatory hiring practices, even if unintentional, can result in lawsuits. Organizations are increasingly held accountable for their diversity and inclusion efforts, and unconscious bias can undermine these initiatives.

Missed Opportunities

Ultimately, following unconscious bias means recruiters overlook talented candidates who could bring valuable skills and perspectives to the organization. It is a loss of potential innovation, growth, and possible revenue for the organization.

Strategies for Recruiters to Avoid Unconscious Bias

1. Education

Raise awareness among your hiring team through training programs on unconscious bias. When you learn and grow together as a team, you recognize overarching biases and understand how they can influence the company culture. 

2. Structured Interviews

Structured interviews involve asking all candidates the same set of questions in the same order, which helps to reduce the influence of unconscious bias. This approach ensures that each candidate is evaluated based on the same criteria, making it easier to compare candidates objectively. Structured interviews also reduce the likelihood of the interviewer focusing on irrelevant factors, such as personal rapport or non-verbal cues.

3. Diverse Hiring Panels

Involving a diverse group in the hiring process counteracts individual biases. Everyone will bring their perspective to the evaluation process, which can help to identify each other’s biases. Diverse panels are more likely to make fair and inclusive decisions, leading to better hiring outcomes overall.

4. Standardized Evaluation Criteria

Developing standardized evaluation criteria will reduce the influence of unconscious bias because it sets a clear and consistent framework for recruiters to evaluate candidates. Instead of gut instincts or intuition, each candidate can be fairly and objectively reviewed.

5. Regular Bias Audits

Conducting regular bias audits of the recruitment process can help organizations identify areas where unconscious bias may be influencing decisions. These audits can involve reviewing hiring data to identify patterns of bias, as well as soliciting feedback from candidates and hiring managers.

6. Blind Hiring

Blind hiring involves removing identifying information, such as name, gender, age, and educational background, from resumes and applications during the initial screening process. It can reduce biases related to these factors and encourage recruiters to focus on the candidate’s skills and experience. While blind hiring is not a complete solution, it can be an effective tool for minimizing bias in the early stages of recruitment. Read more about blind hiring here

7. Use of AI and Technology

While AI and technology are not without their challenges, they can be leveraged to reduce unconscious bias in recruitment. Tools that use algorithms to screen resumes, assess candidates, or conduct social media screenings can help remove some of the human bias from the process. However, it is important to ensure that these tools are designed and implemented in a way that does not perpetuate existing biases.

Unconscious bias is a pervasive issue in recruitment. By understanding how unconscious bias can impact recruitment, and by implementing strategies to mitigate its effects, we can create a more inclusive and equitable hiring process. Ultimately, addressing unconscious bias is not a one-size-fits-all solution but an ongoing process toward a more inclusive future. 

Discover More Diversity Recruiting Avenues with TalentAlly

Find solutions to your unique industry issues with TalentAlly’s diverse networks. We connect job seekers to companies like you who are committed to developing a more inclusive workforce. Discover flexible job fairs, scalable job distribution, and more